So, to review, an evaluative essay contains three key elements: judgment , criteria and evidence . These elements are presented using four key essay components: it starts with an introduction that houses a thesis, which gives your overall opinion and focuses your evaluation. Next, background information is included to help your reader understand what it is you are evaluating. Then, paragraphs discuss each of your criteria and present evidence to support your reasoning. Last, a conclusion wraps up your evaluation and provides closure for your reader.
The choice of one of the research essay topics can be a laborious and time consuming process, as you have to choose from a great variety of topics the one which will suit you and will meet your interests. Remember that your work shouldn't be a pain in the neck for you. You have to enjoy the process of exploration with the awareness that it is useful for your development, for broadening your outlook and in general it will enrich your knowledge. Therefore, you have to approach to the question of selecting the research essay topics with a due degree of responsibility.
Berlin saw Rousseau's conjecture being particularly dangerous to liberty. In Berlin's view, Rousseau had associated freedom with self-determination, yet self-determination with obedience to the general will. The notion of the general will, being quite separate from individual (particular) wills, went against Berlin's conception of liberalism, for it alleged the existence of a common interest encompassing the interests of all men: an absolute, single set of rules for all, which Berlin saw as being a divergence from the pluralist tradition of liberalism. Rousseau also went some way to disguising man's true nature, as Berlin saw it, by conceiving man as a citizen being, rather than a lone, individual creature - an unrealistic transformation of human interest. Furthermore, Rousseau was said to have changed the concept of man's will from what he actually desires empirically, to a will that he ought, or should, desire, but may not through the nature of the human condition (Berlin 2002). Emphasised by his strong Calvinist influence, we could also add to this Rousseau's deeply-rooted sense of morality, a sense of right and wrong, and what it means to live a good (and bad) life, which we can take Berlin to object to on the basis of its limitation on individual choice and self-determination.